Update Rust crate `deadpool` to 0.13.0 by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8700 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-05-06T01:01:12Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
deadpool	workspace.dependencies	minor	`0.12.3` → `0.13.0`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

deadpool-rs/deadpool (deadpool)

`v0.13.0`

Compare Source

`v0.12.4`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
Automerge
- "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-05-06T01:01:14Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 1:13am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 1:13am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 6, 2026 1:13am

cursor · 2026-05-06T01:01:20Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Upgrades the core connection-pool crate used by the Postgres store, which could subtly change pooling/runtime behavior under load despite being a minor version bump.

Overview
Updates the workspace Rust dependency deadpool from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0.

Refreshes Cargo.lock accordingly, introducing deadpool-runtime 0.3.1 (and keeping the older 0.1.4 for deadpool-postgres 0.14.1) and normalizing winnow lock entries to a single 1.0.2 version reference.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 252d9ba. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-05-06T01:03:22Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust workspace dependency deadpool from 0.12.3 to 0.13.0.

Changes: Bumps the version in Cargo.toml and refreshes Cargo.lock accordingly.

Why: Routine dependency maintenance via Renovate.

Technical Notes: Since deadpool is pre-1.0, this minor bump may include API/behavior changes and updated runtime/MSRV constraints.

Considerations: Confirm there’s no version skew/type mismatch with crates that also pull in deadpool transitively (e.g. via deadpool-postgres).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

augmentcode · 2026-05-06T01:03:23Z

 dashu-base                         = { version = "0.4.1", default-features = false }
 dashu-float                        = { version = "0.4.3", default-features = false }
-deadpool                           = { version = "0.12.3", default-features = false }
+deadpool                           = { version = "0.13.0", default-features = false }


Cargo.toml:139 — deadpool-postgres 0.14.1 depends on deadpool ^0.12, so bumping the workspace deadpool to 0.13 can introduce two deadpool versions and lead to type incompatibilities if any crate ends up using both directly. It may be worth double-checking the dependency graph/usages to ensure everything is consistently on the same deadpool API surface.

Severity: medium

_{🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎, or 🚀 if it prevented an incident/outage.}

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 252d9ba. Configure here.}

cursor · 2026-05-06T01:03:39Z

 dashu-base                         = { version = "0.4.1", default-features = false }
 dashu-float                        = { version = "0.4.3", default-features = false }
-deadpool                           = { version = "0.12.3", default-features = false }
+deadpool                           = { version = "0.13.0", default-features = false }


Incompatible deadpool versions between direct and transitive dependencies

High Severity

Upgrading deadpool to 0.13.0 while deadpool-postgres (0.14.1) still depends on deadpool ^0.12.0 introduces two incompatible versions of deadpool in the dependency tree. The hash-graph-postgres-store crate declares deadpool as public = true, so downstream consumers see deadpool 0.13.0 types, but deadpool-postgres exposes types (like Pool, PoolConfig, PoolError) based on deadpool 0.12.3. These types are not interchangeable across semver-incompatible 0.x versions in Rust. No version of deadpool-postgres currently supports deadpool 0.13.0.

Additional Locations (2)

Cargo.lock#L3528-L3530

Cargo.lock#L2113-L2114

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 252d9ba. Configure here.}

codecov · 2026-05-06T01:05:31Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.08%. Comparing base (e8f59de) to head (252d9ba).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8700      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.08%   62.08%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1341              
  Lines      135078   135078              
  Branches     5744     5744              
==========================================
- Hits        83862    83860       -2     
- Misses      50308    50310       +2     
  Partials      908      908

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.19% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.38% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.63% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.29% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`92.64% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-06T01:06:36Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing deps/rs/deadpool-rust-crates (252d9ba) with main (e8f59de)}

github-actions · 2026-05-06T02:16:33Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.325 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.37 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.074 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.75 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.36 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.380 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$47.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.034 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$54.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$47.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$39.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$242 \mathrm{ms} \pm 638 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-15.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.503 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$21.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 339 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.931 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$33.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$7.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 36.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$95.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 454 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$161 \mathrm{ms} \pm 679 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.87 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}9.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$502 \mathrm{ms} \pm 913 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update Rust crate deadpool to 0.13.0

252d9ba

hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 6, 2026 01:01

github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 6, 2026

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 6, 2026 01:03 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed May 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 6, 2026 01:04 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 6, 2026 01:13 View deployment

hash-worker Bot assigned indietyp and TimDiekmann May 6, 2026

hash-worker Bot requested a review from a team May 6, 2026 01:47

Conversation

hash-worker Bot commented May 6, 2026

Release Notes

v0.13.0

v0.12.4

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 6, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor Bot May 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Incompatible deadpool versions between direct and transitive dependencies

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 6, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 6, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

`v0.13.0`

`v0.12.4`

vercel Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

augmentcode Bot May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading